Completely forgot about this. Thanks for corrections. I am trying my best to improve my writing, curretly i'm not really sure if the punctuation problems are gone - in fact, i'm sure the problems reduced, though they are still in my writing - but the other problems (such as the spelling and grammar) has been a lot more fixed.
I definitely prefer the new site theme, but this theme still looks pretty decent. This served as a good inspiration for Hallprint
What level takes the appearance off?
“Slynk” is just gibberish here. I believe it’s meant to confuse you.
Death So Beautiful
Body
Quite a nice balance of absurd and bittersweet/melancholy makes this a great read imo.
The article has been marked for rewriting, and I am currently rewriting it, I will implement all the feedback I receive.
Hello! Actually, this is my first article on Wikidot, so I understand there are areas I can improve. I’ll take your observations into account and try to refine the text if I need to rewrite the entity.
A bit too all over the place, and very derivative of the myriad of other fleshy infection beasts that have come out of the internet. The logs read a bit like parodies and don't add much to the article or the worldbuilding.
There are roads,
a samurai must travel…
I upvoted this page and now it has a +200 rate😄👍
I've always thought that the Windows wallpaper looked like a liminal space, so I'm glad to see a level written about it
For my own personal enjoyment I think I'll reread and critique this in a bit since it's been a while :V
Probably monday if I've got le time
That's Brilliant! Photos too. And this animated text that add a feel of presence! I'm delighted.
P.s.
siiiimpply… haaavving… a won…der..ful..chri..st…massss…time…
Update:
Name: MaskedTale41. You may call me Pen if you so wish.
Will Crit: Nearly everything except objects. Also, things that fail to hold my attention through the read, as I will lose interest in critiquing it.
Won't Crit: Things that fail to hold my attention while reading them[if this is the case, I will reply on what I think needs to be improved], objects, phenomena, and articles with a clear lack of effort or too many SPaG errors.
Strengths: SPaG. Please note that I do not pay attention to my own errors in typing, especially now that I work mainly on mobile, I will also avoid certain sensitive topics.
Weaknesses: Formatting, format screws, and general conceptional.
Likes: I like a well-thought out article with a unique concept. I also appreciate attention-grabbers.
Dislikes: Articles that are too long. I lose attention quickly. I am unable to sit through a bible's worth of information, even if it is a well-written article,
How to Contact: Reachable on Wikidot. I am currently uninterested in rejoining the discord.
Availability:
I will mostly be on for a few hours between 1:30-2:50pmish every weekday.
I will be mostly be available for those who are looking to have their drafts critiqued for SPaG in the forums; I I will probably be one of the few critiques most active on the forums.
I find this interesting, but without further context I really do not understand what I'm reading. Until I get around to reading more, I'm not going to make a decision on whether I like it or not.
YT URL no longer works, as the video is unavailable.
It's a cool part of our site and I'm almost shocked
I liked the text; it's simple and conveys all the necessary information without the fluff. It also explains BNTG very well for the average reader, considering how many pages there are on MEG. The visual component is also simple and pleasing to the eye.
While BNTG was well described, it doesn't affect the level. For me, it lacks content. Moon Mites are cool, but I'd like something more. Beauford also lacks detail and lore; at the moment, it's just an entity—a function designed to unleash storms, which isn't good.
I'm glad this level was rewritten. While it lacks content, it's still a pleasure to read. 4/6.
