Recent Forum Posts
From categories:
page 1123...next »

Thanks! I've since ported your new component!

Re: Downvote by Abdallah AmrAbdallah Amr, 19 Jan 2026 15:52

Th3wanderAllenTh3wanderAllen, why did you revert page to version 0?


签名档签名档签名档签名档签名档。

by calf-0calf-0, 19 Jan 2026 15:20

One of my favorite levels, I love the concept of ventilation as another, separate level.

Amogus reference

FNaF reference

💃


POLSKA GUROM

+1 by LisMatisLisMatis, 18 Jan 2026 17:40

With all due respect, this article is really terrible. The structure is unclear, and when describing Level 3 three, didn't it mention the infinitely vast toxic mercury ocean? If we put ourselves in that scenario, if a wanderer were to enter it, they would have nowhere to go and would immediately die.
How could there possibly be outposts or other groups existing there? The text is extremely contradictory. Also, remember Level 71? It could have been written much better, but you only writed it to write about Th3 Sh4dy Gr3y.
In conclusion, I believe this article is merely a vulgar piece that just piles up words.


Recurser

dv by RecurserRecurser, 18 Jan 2026 06:02

As a non-native English speaker. I am excited to be part of this community and look forward to learning from all of you. Please feel free to point out any mistakes I might make.

My biggest complaint isn't about the execution. This is well-written, and the ending really pulls the body horror aspect in a convincing manner.

No, really, my biggest problem is that this is similar to SCP-2316 in a way that was actually distracting, and that is unfortunate. There are significant differences, but not enough for me to upvote. Sorry!

Notes:

If there is wine today, then today is the day to get drunk

The original of this passage is 今朝有酒今朝醉. It is a line of poetry, so I used translation provided in Wiktionary


签名档签名档签名档签名档签名档。

Translator's Note by calf-0calf-0, 17 Jan 2026 02:58

I think the prose of this could use some tweaking. I guess it’s realistic in the aspect that it seems like a letter someone would write, but it doesn’t flow as nicely as I think it could. The structure was very obviously trying to mimic the standard level template, and I feel like you could’ve blended it in with the rest of the letter a bit more. It kind of broke the immersion for me.

I do like the ending, as Endrew said, the hints of obsession were there, but I feel like you could’ve just done more with it, you know? It feels more comedic than it is scary, and maybe that was your goal, but I think that hinders the story more than it elevates it.

I will say that the letter thing was pretty cool. I do like all the different coding elements that tie this all together (I’m sure looking back you have your own issues with it, but I think it’s still pretty neat.)

Overall, I like this, but I feel like there’s a bit too much holding it back for me to upvote it.

novote by ReyDayReyDay, 17 Jan 2026 02:15

This photo is very old, HOW HAVE A SKIN-STEALER IN LEVEL 0???

Good enty, but bad photo by Noob_KorimNoob_Korim, 16 Jan 2026 14:24

Poís é, pra que reescrever?

Re: Why rewrite?? by Noob_KorimNoob_Korim, 16 Jan 2026 14:19

I love this level, and before the rework is most beutifoul. Sorry, i dont speak english :(

Eu amo esser nivel cara, eu disse q seria meu favorito mas isso foi só um modo de falar, apesar de que realmente eu curto muito esse nivel. Parece q vai ter outro rework ,tomara q fique melhor ainda

Re: +1 by doctrinatordoctrinator, 16 Jan 2026 06:34

i cant believe you planned to surprise me with this you're evil you're actually evil.

utterly devastating +1 by doctrinatordoctrinator, 16 Jan 2026 06:33

Both absolutely terrible and touching page as a trans person. Despite being short, the emotions hit so close to home I think I threw up in my mouth a bit while reading. Great Job Alba

+1 by matthewschaosmatthewschaos, 16 Jan 2026 04:37

Reading this article wasn't too bad. I really liked how simple it is but at the cost of substance. while it takes no more than a few minutes, reading doesn't tell you anything other than "just bathtubs that cause anxiety and panic". My gripe is that it was stated to be nothing wrong with the bathtubs but nothing either when someone touched it. Now i know that there can be an inference or some insight to understand that obviously something had happened, but what exactly. Did the person finding this not experience anything? and if he did, why isnt it mentioned? i say this because it was clearly noted that "nothing had happened when touching the bathtub". If it was noteworthy to write it down then something is affecting the person who discovered and wrote the article. i could go on and even talk about the entity that resides there to hide the inside of bathtubs but i wont as it would make this longer than it already was.

Overall, i like this article and find it unique. Besides my earlier points, i think there could be a bit more written around the effects of what the bathtubs do. Saying it did "nothing" but really it did do something could just be written more on its effects over something so vague. Theres nothing wrong with vague if done right and with the right insight but here it feels a bit flat for something trying to be done here.

i wont be rating this at this time, but if it gets better with revisions then i may change my mind.

Neutral, no rating by Alice TapewormAlice Tapeworm, 16 Jan 2026 01:09

Seller, I know a doctrin— a guy. Like, one who would totally buy this mirror off you. He'd probably think it's really sexy cause you've touched it once. Will be letting him know


You promised you'd take me there again some day… but you never did.

+1 by scutoid studiosscutoid studios, 16 Jan 2026 00:35



Many thanks to DivineAtlasDivineAtlas for the precious crit and the greenlight. You're great, truly.

Sorry to LiminalDoctorLiminalDoctor who didn't get to crit this, I apologize!

And thank you to doctrinatordoctrinator for being so supportive with this character, as well as SchulzenreichSchulzenreich for telling to write this shit myself lmao

AUTHOR POST by CamaradeAlbabarCamaradeAlbabar, 15 Jan 2026 22:34
WynthsWynths 15 Jan 2026 20:06
in discussion Meta / Per page discussions » Blurbcon

the thought of the official backrooms blurb being a fucking ad for the GPD is so amusing that I preemptively cast my vote for it. exactly the type of boilerplate a real wiki might have.

by WynthsWynths, 15 Jan 2026 20:06
+1
KillerOreo52KillerOreo52 15 Jan 2026 14:52
in discussion Meta / Per page discussions » The Sun

Sniped ez lol

+1 by KillerOreo52KillerOreo52, 15 Jan 2026 14:52

LINKS? (I just changed my username, so that's what the link is now.)
1. Object 58- "Vitality Crystal", http://backrooms-sandbox-2.wikidot.com/collab:dl-duck-58. (3 offsets).
2. Object 62- "Red Candle", http://backrooms-sandbox-2.wikidot.com/dl-duck-62.
3. Object 63- "The Oil Lamp? — The Wandering Lamp", http://backrooms-sandbox-2.wikidot.com/collab:dl-duck-63. (8 offsets).
4. Level 382- "The Endless Waiting Room", http://backrooms-sandbox-2.wikidot.com/dl-duck-1.
5. Level 498- "The Brass Waystation", http://backrooms-sandbox-2.wikidot.com/dl-duck-2.

page 1123...next »
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License