This article's use of clinical is kind of iffy. There are a multitude of parts where the professionalism breaks and other parts where it tries to prove some point.
Coming from the page announcement channel on discord, It wouldn't have struck me that this was a level scarred by time
This article does a lot of telling but little showing. Especially with the groups part. Writing all of this in the M.E.G. perspective makes something seem missing.
No vote
