It is truly passionning to wonder about the many different hints scattered over this magnificent piece guiding the reader into what the author truly intended.
We have quite an interesting read here. Of course, the most obvious parallel can be made between the author and the nature of the main element of the page. Bluesignet writing a level about a blue curtain shows a certain amount of commitment, as the willingness to put oneself on the site. This "self-insert" of some sort acts as a representation of the author to give their time to the wiki by producing articles through blood and sweat as a way to immortalize themselves in everlasting words.
Moreover, the parallel with the author doesn't end there. As we know, with Bluesignet working in a library, she interacts a lot with books. From there, the metaphoric relation between the reader and the book can easily be linked to the relation between the worker and the user. While the worker can act normally for their job, just helping the user find a book, or animating an event, said user can see the worker as something completely different depending on their mood. This is shown here with the use of colors and feelings, which can be used as a parallel for the different ways one can see the other through the prism of their own feelings, shifting reality to their daily, and therefore limited, perception. This theme acts as a paradox with the feeling of eternity showcased earlier, which shows how both a piece of writing and a person can act in complex ways, adding to the idea of someone being more than the exterior eye can see and judge.
But perhaps the most important element of the page lies not in the color, but in the material itself. indeed, the use of the curtain, an everyday furniture, as the object of intense care and importance acts as sort of a wider commentary about our society in general. With the elements of nature and the outside being present only once, barely named at the start, the curtain acts as the artificial, something manmade retaining the attention of man. The outside world isn't important for them, as their attention and care goes to something completely meaningless. This shows the futility of the concentration of one's attention to anything purely created to retain said attention, actively making them rot wondering about the futile question of the color of an object that is merely a tool to store clothes. By not only ignoring what is important in natural beauty, but also by ignoring the intended purpose of the object, the commentary clearly states the meaningless attempt of man to entertain himself through the use of the repurposed artificial, but to no avail.
To conclude this analysis, we can open our minds even more and start wondering past the shackles of a typical analysis. Perhaps the writer simply used the color blue because he merely thought of the color before any other one, which would be a direct commentary of the overthinking many readers can fall into. This refreshing yet controversial take, like an Ouroboros, completely closes the circle and complete this piece as something truly perfect, evoking the mind of the reader in many different directions.