Phenomenon 33 - "Autocorrect" / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page Phenomenon 33 - "Autocorrect".

+1 all around!

ReyDay 04 Jun 2024 13:22

The unique execution, the concept, everything about this is just incredible! You’ve truly outdone yourself, Goerman. This is one of, if not THE, most impressive instances of clinical tone that I’ve seen. The structure of this page makes it feel so full and elegant, yet simple and easy to comprehend while STILL maintaining a mysterious aspect?! Really, fantastic job.

Re: +1 all around!

Robert Goerman 04 Jun 2024 13:59

ReyDay,

I like to think that I am writing for the casual reader curious about the Backrooms, attempting to balance information with popular narratives. Your kind and gentle praise tells me that I hit the mark this time. Now, the Backrooms has balance, yin and yang. Thank you for the snipe!

---

Your friend and colleague,
Goerman
http://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/goerman

Crumbzee 08 Jun 2024 04:12

This is probably my new favorite phenomenon, everything about it was great from start to finish

Robert Goerman 08 Jun 2024 07:08

Crumbzee,

Thank you so very much, my friend and colleague! To be anybody's favorite anything is quite the honor.

---

Your friend and colleague,
Goerman
http://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/goerman

Late, but +1.

Error012 08 Jun 2024 17:46

It took me too long to give my opinion on this article. Now yes, it is a good phenomenon. I think one of the most interesting in terms of history, concept and writing. I love it.

Re: Late, but +1.

Robert Goerman 09 Jun 2024 16:20

Error012,

Thank you so very much! I was starting to get a little lonely here.

I think that Liminal Echo and Autocorrect counterbalance each other.

Maybe this old Goerman is back on track…

---

Your friend and colleague,
Goerman
http://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/goerman

ROBOT REVIEWS

Super-Robot14 12 Jul 2024 03:09

+1, it's an interesting concept with good execution. As simple as that, really. I enjoyed how to concept was expanded upon as I read further, but not much really seemed that connected. It felt like a collection of similar phenomenon rather than one cohesive one. I liked the tone of writing, a more scientific and explanatory one rather than what I normally think of as clinical (which I don't enjoy). T'was fun to read!

(sidenote: you're use of exclamation marks was unsettling given the tone, but that's just me personally.)

Re: ROBOT REVIEWS

Robert Goerman 12 Jul 2024 13:26

This author loves readers - and comments from readers! And - I love exclamation marks!

It is true that there are eleven exclamation marks in the article; they are confined to witness testimony.

Eyewitnesses can get so excited when their lives are on the line.

Thank you ever so much, my friend and colleague, for taking the time to read and share.

---

Your friend and colleague,
Goerman
http://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/goerman

+1

Nimortal 12 Dec 2024 14:41

What a truly unique phenomenon!
The bits of stories tell about the phenomenon with a bit of an immersive spin, and I love it that way.
Really well done, if I could I might just +2.

---

-The infamous radioactive piece of bread.

Re: +1

Robert Goerman 28 Jan 2025 15:42

Thank you, my friend and colleague! I try and try and try to bring more better lore.

---

Your friend and colleague,
Goerman
http://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/goerman