I thought this might be a format-screw article but when I checked the tag zone, I didn't find any tag. The author information and the bottom navigation which leads to adjacent entities are also missing.
OK, it has tags now, but the author information and the bottom navigation are still missing.
you don't need the author information. some people don't like to include it just because of their preferences.
if you see this, this is a forum signature. if you want one, check out https://www.wikidot.com/account/settings#/forumsignature
No offense, but that's really a strange statement. I think no matter how free we can create an article, there always exist some standard templates that we need to follow, including author information.
that's cool man glad you feel that way. i personally find it very immersion breaking and dont like it but to each their own. im the author. navigation is not hard to be done on its own. for now im gonna keep it the way i like it.
There is a couple of SPaG errors within the page, but nothing that would decrease readability to any excessive degree. I believe formatting could be improved a little, but for a sort of half tale half entity I am not expecting anything too complex. What changes my upvote to a no-vote is the origin of the aforementioned errors — the fact that there isn't a single link despite the necessity makes it look like it was written as fast as possible — I strongly believe that wasn't the case, but the overall (how do I put this?) flatness of the story kinda ruins the read, but not too much, I'll give you that. I also liked how it seemed a sort of consciousness flow but also an explanation of what this entity is — I really liked this, personally.
Hopefully this feedback was helpful. Oh, and sorry if I misused em dashes lol.
~Forest
Please mind the Forest.
most spag is intentional for the first portion. i find people rarely think or speak with proper grammar. the second portion is meant to be semiclinical but if it has spag that's just on me.
formatting feels like a gimmick to me and i am way too lazy to learn any css beyond what i know (which is just blockquotes anyways) but i can see why youd think the formatting here is minimalistic.
i will admit this was written and reviewed in the span of about… 45-50 minutes. i'm not sure what you mean by flatness but i can only assume you mean it is very straightforward, which yeah was done of my own volition. i don't mind that you dislike it though. thank you for your feedback, i will keep it in mind for future endeavors.