Library
Wiki
Community
This a solid level, plain and simple. The narration is great, and it works great with the theme and image to create a solid and fitting atmosphere. :]
Goodness, wikidot has a weird account system. What's this weird forum signature thi
<33
yes
SecondtoInfinity,
Actually, this is not a solid level. It is "The Broken," a "fragmented, corrupted expanse," an "assemblage of seemingly innumerable levels." Ha!
You hit the nail on the head as to the great narration, theme, and image.
An amazing effort with fantastic results!
I would have enjoyed any suggestion of an Entrance.
An Exit, of course, seems like a moot point.
How was it discovered? How has information regarding its existence found its way back to us?
What about the passage of time there?
Your friend and colleague,
Goerman
http://backrooms-wiki.wikidot.com/goerman
Yeah, a general "how the level was discovered and escaped/how to enter and escape the level" addition should have been included, although the level doesn't suffer from that enough to warrant a downvote in my eyes. I'd say that it does push it towards the boundary of "too simple," especially for such a large concept, but again, not enough to really spoil the article for me. (This is definitely a personal preference; it's a flaw that I don't blame other people for disliking more)
However, something that I initially missed was that the image wasn't CC-compliant, that does need absolutely to be fixed. :P
Goodness, wikidot has a weird account system. What's this weird forum signature thi
As refreshing as it is to see an out-there concept not patting its own back on how high a concept it is, and just presenting its concept in a very standard and almost refreshing standard format, this almost feels…. too simple.
It's a fun idea, yes! But just not done to a good degree. I appreciate the willingness to make it a strictly format article, something I definitely applaud, I feel the format is unfortunately too simple. It's just the description of a place, and then… that's it. I'm not saying that that kind of format never works(hell, you could possibly argue that the simple format makes this article more interesting because of the juxtaposition between out there concept and simple format), but for me… it just doesn't do it. Not enough stuff, at least for me.
Eyy.. i just typed a loada garrbagge
Typically, I wouldn't mind an article being short but I think that it's length combined with how it's written just make it an article I struggle to enjoy. It was just drastically…. uninteresting to me. The high concept wasn't communicated in a way that went further than just a well written description. I'm not saying articles need narrative, but this sort of drag on clinical description contrasts it's high concept idea in a way that just makes it feel underwhelming. It doesn't utilize it's conceptual elements well, so -1
Well, this is mostly just from personal preference stuff but maybe shortening the description and adding an additional section such as some sort of log would make it a little better. This is mostly just my personal taste, though, so take it with a grain of salt.
Pretty cool ngl. Only problem is the length, but aside from that, good job 👍
short, but good idea, it also came from the fandom page so that's neat
good idea, a bit short for my liking, but likeable. +1
CharaDotArchivist
The demon that comes when you call her name.
