Level 93 - "The Summit" / Discussion

This is the discussion related to the wiki page Level 93 - "The Summit".

This article is 2 and a half years old and there are no comments

Yoink_Fricc06 08 May 2023 18:29

I actually do really enjoy this one considering the semi basic concept, but the execution was great!

---

yoink_

-1

userunhacked 20 Jun 2023 00:50

scp-y as hell and the spag is just not good

---

if you see this, this is a forum signature. if you want one, check out https://www.wikidot.com/account/settings#/forumsignature

Mecheye 29 Jul 2023 03:23

So wanders can’t leave, and it seems that after two hours it gets impossible to survive here. Why would anyone come here?

Last edited on 29 Jul 2023 03:24 by Mecheye Show more

-1

r a t i f 16 Jan 2024 16:02

Not enough interesting factors. Basically an SCP page

-1

(account deleted) 16 May 2024 19:54

Sorry, I'm gonna have to agree with the others. I've counted so many grammatical and punctuational errors here. Additionally, this article does indeed have an SCP-esque vibe that accompanies it. Keep writing, though. Success will come with time.

1:00 am binge-read session

centurys lute 04 Sep 2024 00:50

interesting concept, but how do you debunk the existence of lakes in an infinite/baseless level?

also the log just reiterates everything communicated in the clinical section.

-1

novote

Crabs the Tubular 13 Jan 2025 03:06

I have similar complaints to everyone else, with the only exception being the "Too much like SCP" complaint. In most cases I would agree with this, but I think the level being formatted the way it is fits the vibe of exploring a level that's similar to that of Mount Everest. I honestly think clinical tone would benefit this level if done right

---

U.E. Menzies

-1

Kiraura 13 Feb 2025 19:30

How were lakes even a claim on a level that is perpetual elevation? Wouldn't common sense automatically debunk this? Also redacted text is kind of an SCP thing.

-1

LuBQingdaode 16 Mar 2025 02:39

The weather part accounts for nearly 1/4, and the layout is unreasonable