Comments for page "Object 37 - "Star Candy""

Re: I look forward to when it is rewrite.

Thu, 02 Apr 2026 01:11:22 +0000

I edited some stuff, and I hope it is written better now! :)

Re: -1 in 2025

Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:29:49 +0000

Yeah, I wrote this a while ago. I'm planning on rewriting it.

I look forward to when it is rewrite.

Fri, 30 May 2025 06:24:57 +0000

Hm, I hope the article is rewritten soon and the potential for further development is also very potential if it can get more attention!

-1 in 2025

Wed, 16 Apr 2025 17:16:30 +0000

So this article doesn't do anything unique (as the previous comment illustrated. It can be boiled down to "Candy that can be melted into a drink". All other effects are incredibly minor and not expanded upon. Here's stuff that your article is unoriginal in:
1. Object that heals slightly (Almond Water; Greasy Marshmallows; Royal Rations; Lucky O' Milk)
2. Object that can be melted down into a drink (Greasy Marshmallow; Ultimate Backrooms Cookbook)
3. Candy (Candy; Umi's Sweets; Chocobytes; Dumb Gum; Greasy Marshmallows)
4. Different varieties of food (Almond Water; Lucky O' Milk; Candy; Umi's Sweets)

It isn't bad, your article will never be completely unique, but the few concepts you bring up are used in so many other places.

If I were to give you a suggestion on how to quickly improve your article, I'd suggest moving it down to a later slot, like Object 79. Your article is surrounded by amazing articles or articles with a similar style, so putting it farther down could differentiate it in context. This, of course, would need to be done by an admin.

The best way to make your article better is just rewriting it. Give us something fresh. Until then, for all the unoriginalness and lackluster writing, I give this a -1.

Re: Feels unoriginal

Mon, 12 Aug 2024 15:02:11 +0000

You have? I haven't seen any;;

Maybe I'll rewrite this someday

Feels unoriginal

Sat, 23 Mar 2024 06:02:54 +0000

The ideas making up this object I’ve seen before in other pages.

Re: This should won

Mon, 06 Nov 2023 01:25:35 +0000

Thanks! :)

Re: This should won

Sat, 04 Nov 2023 19:04:14 +0000

(among the classicon)

This should won

Sat, 04 Nov 2023 19:03:51 +0000

This is the most basic and classic one out of all. I am voting to this.

Re: +1, however:

Fri, 27 Oct 2023 00:57:38 +0000

I'll try to work out some extra details!

+1, however:

Thu, 26 Oct 2023 18:20:50 +0000

This entry is like cake without icing. Its good for what it is, but its missing that little extra bit of detail that could send it to the top. Solid concept, definitely embodies the feel of classicon, its nothing special, but it doesn't have to be. Overall I give it a "B"

(no title)

Thu, 26 Oct 2023 03:01:05 +0000

Whoops, almost forgot :0

Re: I don't hate it, but...

Thu, 26 Oct 2023 02:26:59 +0000

Thanks for the advice, I'll try to work more on this!

(no title)

Wed, 25 Oct 2023 23:28:23 +0000

Make sure to include your license box.

I don't hate it, but...

Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:12:18 +0000

Yeah so you just made drugs in the Backrooms a thing, right? /lh

More seriously, I think the "addictive" aspect of your object is interesting and could have been further developed. I think the idea of an object which would be useful in small doses but dangerous in higher doses really fits the survival aspect of the Backrooms! Another small gripe is the "calming effect" the object gives, which seems unnecessary in my eyes. Maybe it should be an effect when consumed, furthering the risk of addiction, as wanderers may want to use it while under stress.

It is a novote for me, but it could develop into an upvote if slightly reworked.

(no title)

Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:44:38 +0000

I also realized that just before reading this comment :0
Have to admit that it was a bit rushed.
Since the rules say that people are allowed to edit their posts after posting them, I'll try to change that up a bit soon.
Thanks for your help!

Re: -1, too lackluster (even for a classic page)

Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:40:02 +0000

I'll keep that in mind.

-1, too lackluster (even for a classic page)

Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:28:12 +0000

Something I don't like with most classic 2020 pages is how they present elements they don't use. Here, almost everything you present is underused: the addiction aspect, the colors, the drink, the classified information part… which makes the overall page feel like a wasted opportunity, despite its potential as an interesting lore element. Downvote for now, but I think a rewrite with proper expansion of each part to make everything both useful and interesting for the overall universe.

(no title)

Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:27:19 +0000

All I've got to say is that the "classified information" bit isn't necessary and somewhat disappoints the reader to find that they can't see such "classified information". It may be better to find a different closure to your article. Plus, for there to be an access denied, it would mean someone had to put it there, implying there was a group who wrote and placed your article in the database. So while not directly stated or mention, you tie your article to a group.
To quote the contest page, "The involvement of major groups (such as the M.E.G. or the B.N.T.G.) in your article is discouraged."
Plus, you bring up several interesting details, and then don't dive into them. I really don't like that as a reader, with any article.
-1
I wish I could help you more, but I don't know why other people downvoted because I'm not a mind reader.
Byyyyyyyeeeee
~ Pen
P.S. Also, check your PMs. I sent you three different ones(possibly four) and haven't gotten a single reply.

Re: STAR

Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:20:41 +0000

Thanks! :D

STAR

Tue, 24 Oct 2023 04:19:47 +0000

STAR STAR STAR STAR

And also I'm a fan of the page, good job!

Re: Reads Like an Original

Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:23:37 +0000

I hope so too!

Re: +1

Mon, 23 Oct 2023 22:23:14 +0000

I'm sure it would be refreshing :)

Reads Like an Original

Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:13:41 +0000

Okay, to be honest, this reads like it was written in the "good old days," from the very beginnings of the Backrooms. It is short and sweet, pun intended. The score does NOT do it justice. Hope it avoids deletion and becomes a thing!

+1

Mon, 23 Oct 2023 14:41:39 +0000

This just gives off that strong, classic Backrooms feeling. Also, I would totally like to have an IRL equivalent to the Star Juice because it sounds quite refreshing.

Re: First +1 in Classicon

Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:21:51 +0000

Thanks!

First +1 in Classicon

Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:18:58 +0000

Cheer up cheer up!
I upvote this, since I thougt this really fit with classicon!

Re: +1 from Goerman

Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:47:03 +0000

Thanks lol :)

+1 from Goerman

Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:58:12 +0000

Very CLASSIC.

Re: Classic Page for Classicon

Mon, 23 Oct 2023 01:08:12 +0000

Thanks :)

Classic Page for Classicon

Mon, 23 Oct 2023 00:27:06 +0000

What can I say, this certainly is a classic looking page. +1