⌨ 𝐍𝐚𝐦𝐞:
My name is simple, so you can call me "Error012", but if you want to summarize it further you can choose to call me "Error" or "012". I was going to give myself a different name before, but I don't think you'll be interested, so keep reading.
☑ 𝐖𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐭:
Here is a table to summarize it:
Normal Levels, Unnumbered Levels, Sublayers and Rooms |
These are the ones that I mostly and especially like to criticize, because of how informative they can be and other things, which I can't mention but there are many. Examples are the writing, the theme, the background, etc. |
Normal Entities and Unnumbered Entities |
I can obviously, but they are less common than the different levels, also because of their wording and background. Also, I love the extra edits in these entity drafts a lot. |
Objects |
Objects are interesting when they have more information or attractive wording. So, I might like to read these several times. |
Phenomena |
I don't usually read the phenomena a lot, since for me they are something "extra" from the wiki, so I can criticize these kinds of drafts but I must say that I am not very familiar with the environment. |
Groups |
I like groups, coincidentally why it is useful to go to some level, since at that level perhaps such a group is present (I like the logos of each group). |
Joke Entries |
I like them, but maybe it will mostly give you some little ideas to improve your joke a little. And I must say that the great examples of good joke entries are "The Dankrooms", "backroom", "The Bacarooms" and "The Viberooms". |
☒ 𝐖𝐨𝐧'𝐭 𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐭:
I will not criticize at all, extremely short texts, what I mostly want to see are the drafts with effort. I don't have to say the drafts are effortless, because this is linked to the first thing I put in at the beginning. With many code errors in a long-time member I will not criticize him, but someone recent to the wiki. Purposeful errors are the worst for me, since it seems like a mockery towards the critic and in fact, don't even ask me for criticism if the errors are on purpose because I won't do it.
Tales, POI's, canons and translations are not my thing, personally because I am not interested or attracted too much by tales and POI's. I can definitely criticize the canons, but if you ask only to be able to be on the official site. And the translations, don't talk to me about it at all. I forgot to mention the themes, but it goes without saying.
↑ 𝐒𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐭𝐡𝐬:
The "." the "," the ":" the "SPaG", giving ideas for a draft and conceptual critics are my strengths, especially giving ideas. I have to say that I always add the "." the "," and ":", I always do it guided by my reading. And about SPaG I'm medium good, I can't say I'm an expert, but I'm kind of good, don't judge me.
↓ 𝐖𝐞𝐚𝐤𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞𝐬:
Regarding this, what causes me confusion are the ";" Why don't I understand them well, even though they have already given me a summary, I still can't find the logic.
☻ 𝐋𝐢𝐤𝐞𝐬:
Most of my articles take a lot of effort, since I personally really like to write something long or describe it well, so I like drafts that have had effort. I like that there are no code errors in a draft, if someone is new to the wiki I can understand it, but if someone has been on the wiki for a long time, maybe it will help them a little. I also like short texts, but the ones I like the most are medium or long texts, because they mean that someone has put a lot of effort into it.
☹ 𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐤𝐞𝐬:
I know it's recommended, but I personally don't like drafts with usernames, so sometimes I might tell you to change the name of your draft. For me, the author section is mandatory and very useful, in case someone doesn't know whose work it is.
✆ 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐨 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐭:
Currently, you can contact me on Discord if you want, although I'm usually more active on the wiki (you can contact me whenever and wherever you want so that I can give you my criticism, I will always be checking the forums and messages that I receive.)
⌮ 𝐀𝐯𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲
Currently, you do not need a schedule to contact me. So feel free to send me a Wikidot PM whenever you want, I'm always checking the messages that came to me.